One of the
first
questions a
pilot might
ask, when
converting
to a new
aircraft
type, is
"What's the
stall
speed?" The
reason for
the enquiry
is that
usually, but
not always,
the approach
speed chosen
for landing
is 1.3 times
the stall
speed. Stall
is an
undesirable
phenomenon
in which the
aircraft
wings
produce an
increased
air
resistance
and
decreased
lift, which
may cause an
aircraft to
crash.
The
stall of the
wing occurs
when the
airflow no
longer can
go around
the
airfoil's
nose
(leading
edge) and
separates
from the
upper wing
surface. It
happens when
a plane is
under too
great an
angle of
attack (the
angle of
attack is
the angle
between the
airfoil
chord line
and the
direction of
flight). For
light
aircraft,
without
high-lift
devices, is
this
critical
angle
usually
around 16°.
The picture
to the left
shows a
stalled
airfoil:
The stall
may occur
during
take-off or
landing,
just when
the flight
speed is
low: At low
speed the
aerodynamic
forces are
smaller and,
if a
non-experienced
pilot tries
to lift the
aircraft at
a too low
speed, it
may exceed
the critical
angle of
attack and
stall
occurs. The
rapid
reduction in
speed after
passing the
critical
angle of
attack means
the wing is
now unable
to provide
sufficient
lift to
totally
balance
weight and,
in a normal
stall, the
aircraft
starts to
sink, but if
one wing
stalls
before the
other, that
wing will
drop, the
plane falls
out of the
air. The
ground waits
below.
Stalls may
also occur
at high
airspeeds.
If at max
airspeed and
full
throttle the
pilot
suddenly
applies
excessive up
elevator,
the aircraft
will rotate
upwards,
however, due
to
aircraft's
inertia, it
may continue
flying in
the same
direction
but with the
wings at an
angle of
attack that
may exceed
the stall
angle. See
an example
here
Stalling at
high-speed
gives a more
dramatic
effect than
at low
speed. This
because the
strong
propeller
wash causes
one of the
wings to
stall first
that
combined
with the
high speed
produces a
snaproll
followed by
a spiral
dive. This
happens very
fast causing
the aircraft
to dive at
full
throttle and
unless
there's
enough
height for
recovery,
the crash
will be
inevitable.
An aircraft
with
relatively
low wing
loading
has a lower
stall speed
(wing
loading is
the
aircraft's
weight
divided by
the wing
area). The
airfoil also
affects the
stall speed
and the max
angle of
attack. Many
aircraft are
equipped
with flaps
(on the wing
trailing
edge), and a
few designs
use slats
(on the wing
leading
edge), which
further
lowers the
stall speed
and allow
higher angle
of attack.
Another
factor that
affects the
aircraft's
stall
characteristics
is the
location of
its centre
of gravity
CG. A
tail-heavy
aircraft is
likely to
stall at
higher
airspeed
than one
with the CG
at the right
location.
Aircraft
that are
designed for
Short
Take-Off and
Landing
(STOL) use
slots on the
wing's
leading edge
together
with flaps
on the
trailing
edge, which
gives high
lift
coefficient
and
remarkable
slow flying
capabilities
by allowing
greater
angle of
attack
without
stalling.
The wing on
the left
shows
cruising
attitude and
the one on
the right
shows at
climbing.
The
leading edge
slots
prevent the
stall up to
approximately
30 degrees
angle of
attack by
picking up a
lot of air
from below,
accelerating
the air in
the funnel
shaped slot
(venturi
effect) and
forcing the
air around
the leading
edge onto
the upper
wing
surface.
The
disadvantage
of the slots
and flaps is
that they
produce
higher drag.
Since the
high lift is
only needed
when flying
slowly
(take-off,
initial
climb, and
final
approach and
landing)
some
designers
use
retractable
devices,
which closes
at higher
speeds to
reduce drag.
Such devices
are seldom
used in
model
aircraft
(especially
the smaller
ones),
mainly due
to its
complexity
and also the
increasing
of wing
loading,
which may
counter-act
the
increased
lift
obtained.
Another
method to
improve an
aircraft's
stall
characteristics
is by using
wing
washout,
which refers
to wings
designed so
that the
outboard
sections
have a lower
angle of
attack than
the inboard
sections in
all flight
conditions.
The outboard
sections
(toward the
wing tips)
will reach
the stalling
angle after
the inboard
sections,
thus
allowing
effective
aileron
control as
the stall
progresses.
This is
usually
achieved by
building a
twist into
the wing
structure or
by using a
different
airfoil in
the outboard
section. A
similar
effect is
achieved by
the use of
flaps.
The
aileron drag
is a further
factor that
may cause an
aircraft to
stall. When
the pilot
applies
aileron to
roll upright
during low
speed, the
downward
movement of
the aileron
on the lower
wing might
take an
angle on
that part of
the wing
past the
critical
stall angle.
Thus that
section of
wing, rather
than
increasing
lift and
making the
wing rise,
will stall,
lose lift
and the
aircraft
instead of
straightening
up, will
roll into a
steeper bank
and descend
quickly.
Also the
wing with
the down
aileron
often
produces a
larger drag,
which may
create a yaw
motion in
the opposite
direction of
the roll.
This yaw
motion
partially
counteracts
the desired
roll motion
and is
called the
adverse
yaw.
Following
configurations
are often
used to
reduce
aileron
drag:
-
Differential
ailerons
where
the
down-going
aileron
moves
through
a
smaller
angle
than the
up-going.
-
Frise
ailerons,
where
the
leading
edge of
the
up-going
aileron
protrudes
below
the
wing's
under
surface,
increasing
the drag
on the
down-going
wing.
-
And the
wing
washout.
Stall due to
aileron drag
is more
likely to
occur with
flat bottom
wings. Since
differential
ailerons
will have
the opposite
effect when
flying
inverted,
some
aircraft
with
symmetrical
airfoils
designed for
aerobatics
don't use
this system.
The picture
below
illustrates
an example
of a Frise
aileron
combined
with
differential
up/down
movement.
Recovering
from a
stall: In
order to
recover from
a stall, the
pilot has to
reduce the
angle of
attack back
to a low
value.
Despite the
aircraft is
already
falling
toward the
ground, the
pilot has to
push the
stick
forward to
get the nose
even further
down. This
reduces the
angle of
attack and
the drag,
which
increases
the speed.
After the
aircraft
gained speed
and the
airflow
incidence on
the wing
becomes
favorable,
the pilot
may pull
back on his
stick to
increase the
angle of
attack again
(within
allowable
range)
restoring
the lift.
Since
recovering
from a stall
involves
some loss of
height, the
stall is
most
dangerous at
low
altitudes.
Engine power
can help
reduce the
loss of
height, by
increasing
the velocity
more quickly
and also by
helping to
reattach the
flow over
the wing.
How
difficult it
is to
recover from
a stall
depends on
the plane.
Some
full-size
aircraft
that are
difficult to
recover have
stick
shakers: the
shaking
stick alerts
the pilot
that a stall
is imminent.
Spin
A worse
version of a
stall is
called spin,
in which the
plane
spirals
down. A
stall can
develop into
a spin
through the
exertion of
a sidewise
moment.
Depending on
the plane,
(and where
its CG is
located) it
may be more
difficult or
impossible
to recover
from a spin.
Recovery
requires
good
efficiency
from the
tail
surfaces of
the plane;
typically
recovery
involves the
use of the
rudder to
stop the
spinning
motion, in
addition to
the elevator
to break the
stall.
However the
wings might
block the
airflow to
the tail. If
the centre
of gravity
of the plane
is too far
back, it
tends to
make
recovery
much more
difficult.
Another
circumstance
that may
cause loss
of control
is when a
hinged
control
surface
starts to
flutter.
Such flutter
is harmless
if it just
vibrates
slightly at
certain
airspeed
(possibly
giving a
kind of
buzzing
sound), but
ceases as
soon as the
airspeed
drops. In
some cases
however, the
flutter
increases
rapidly so
that the
model is no
longer
controllable.
The pilot
may not be
aware of the
cause and
suspect
radio
interference
instead. To
reduce the
flutter, the
control
linkages
should not
be loosely
fitted and
the push
rods should
be stiff.
Long
un-braced
push rods
can create
flutter as
vibration
whips them
around. In
some
difficult
cases the
control
surface has
to be
balanced, so
that its
centre of
mass
(gravity) is
ahead of the
hinge line.
It should be
located at
about 60-65%
of the
length of
the control
surface from
its inner
end. |